Forgejo vs Codeberg
Forgejo is community-owned software forge — a Gitea fork focused on governance and sustainability, while Codeberg is non-profit, community-run Git hosting for free and open-source projects. Forgejo is built for communities wanting a community-owned git forge, whereas Codeberg targets open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting.
| Feature | Forgejo | Codeberg |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Actions CI | ✓ | — |
| Community-Owned | ✓ | — |
| Gitea-Based | — | ✓ |
| Non-Profit | — | ✓ |
| Packages | ✓ | — |
| Pages | — | ✓ |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | — |
| Woodpecker CI | — | ✓ |
Pricing: Both Forgejo and Codeberg are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.
Feature gaps: Forgejo offers Actions CI, Community-Owned and Packages that Codeberg lacks. Codeberg brings Gitea-Based, Non-Profit and Pages that Forgejo does not have.
Team fit: Both tools target any size teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Both Forgejo and Codeberg are open source, so self-hosting and code audits are on the table with either choice.
Where each tool shines: Forgejo's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes community-owned as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows. Codeberg's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes non-profit as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows.
Watch out for: With Forgejo, users commonly note that may lack some advanced features. With Codeberg, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
choose Forgejo if
- You need a tool built for communities wanting a community-owned git forge
- You specifically need Actions CI and Community-Owned
- You care about includes community-owned as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows
choose Codeberg if
- You need a tool built for open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting
- You specifically need Gitea-Based and Non-Profit
- You care about includes non-profit as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows
frequently asked
What is the difference between Forgejo and Codeberg?
Forgejo is community-owned software forge — a Gitea fork focused on governance and sustainability, while Codeberg is non-profit, community-run Git hosting for free and open-source projects. Forgejo is built for communities wanting a community-owned git forge, whereas Codeberg targets open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting.
Should I use Forgejo or Codeberg?
Forgejo is built for communities wanting a community-owned git forge. Codeberg is built for open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting. Pick the one that fits.
When should I choose Forgejo over Codeberg?
Choose Forgejo if You need a tool built for communities wanting a community-owned git forge; You specifically need Actions CI and Community-Owned; You care about includes community-owned as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows.
When should I choose Codeberg over Forgejo?
Choose Codeberg if You need a tool built for open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting; You specifically need Gitea-Based and Non-Profit; You care about includes non-profit as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows.
related comparisons
GitHub vs Forgejo · GitLab vs Forgejo · Bitbucket vs Forgejo · Gitea vs Forgejo · Forgejo vs SourceHut · Forgejo vs Azure DevOps · GitHub vs Codeberg · GitLab vs Codeberg