Gitea vs Codeberg
Gitea is lightweight, self-hosted Git service written in Go — fast, easy to install, and open source, while Codeberg is non-profit, community-run Git hosting for free and open-source projects. Gitea is built for teams wanting lightweight self-hosted git, whereas Codeberg targets open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting.
| Feature | Gitea | Codeberg |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Actions CI | ✓ | — |
| Gitea-Based | — | ✓ |
| Lightweight | ✓ | — |
| Non-Profit | — | ✓ |
| Package Registry | ✓ | — |
| Pages | — | ✓ |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | — |
| Woodpecker CI | — | ✓ |
Pricing: Both Gitea and Codeberg are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.
Feature gaps: Gitea offers Actions CI, Lightweight and Package Registry that Codeberg lacks. Codeberg brings Gitea-Based, Non-Profit and Pages that Gitea does not have.
Team fit: Gitea is geared toward small teams teams, while Codeberg is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Both Gitea and Codeberg are open source, so self-hosting and code audits are on the table with either choice.
Where each tool shines: Gitea's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. self-hosted deployment gives you full control over your data and infrastructure. Codeberg's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes non-profit as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows.
Watch out for: With Gitea, users commonly note that may lack some advanced features. With Codeberg, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
choose Gitea if
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting lightweight self-hosted git
- You specifically need Actions CI and Lightweight
- You care about self-hosted deployment gives you full control over your data and infrastructure
- Your team size fits the small teams profile Gitea is designed for
choose Codeberg if
- You need a tool built for open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting
- You specifically need Gitea-Based and Non-Profit
- You care about includes non-profit as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows
- Your team size fits the any size profile Codeberg is designed for
frequently asked
What is the difference between Gitea and Codeberg?
Gitea is lightweight, self-hosted Git service written in Go — fast, easy to install, and open source, while Codeberg is non-profit, community-run Git hosting for free and open-source projects. Gitea is built for teams wanting lightweight self-hosted git, whereas Codeberg targets open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting.
Should I use Gitea or Codeberg?
Gitea is built for teams wanting lightweight self-hosted git. Codeberg is built for open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting. Pick the one that fits.
When should I choose Gitea over Codeberg?
Choose Gitea if Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting lightweight self-hosted git; You specifically need Actions CI and Lightweight; You care about self-hosted deployment gives you full control over your data and infrastructure; Your team size fits the small teams profile Gitea is designed for.
When should I choose Codeberg over Gitea?
Choose Codeberg if You need a tool built for open-source projects wanting non-corporate git hosting; You specifically need Gitea-Based and Non-Profit; You care about includes non-profit as a core feature, purpose-built for version control workflows; Your team size fits the any size profile Codeberg is designed for.
related comparisons
GitHub vs Gitea · GitLab vs Gitea · Bitbucket vs Gitea · Gitea vs Forgejo · Gitea vs SourceHut · Gitea vs Azure DevOps · GitHub vs Codeberg · GitLab vs Codeberg