Make vs Activepieces
Make is visual automation platform for building complex workflows with a drag-and-drop builder, while Activepieces is open-source automation platform with a visual builder, 100+ integrations, and self-hosting option. The biggest difference up front: Activepieces is free, while Make starts at $9/mo. Make is built for power users who want complex automations at a lower cost than zapier, whereas Activepieces targets teams wanting open-source workflow automation.
| Feature | Make | Activepieces |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | — | ✓ |
| 100+ Integrations | — | ✓ |
| Branching Logic | ✓ | — |
| Code Steps | — | ✓ |
| Data Mapping | ✓ | — |
| Error Handling | ✓ | — |
| Real-Time Webhooks | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | — | ✓ |
| Visual Builder | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing: Activepieces is completely free, which makes it the obvious pick if budget is the top concern. Make starts at $9/mo, but Free for 1,000 ops/month. That cost buys you a more polished or feature-rich experience, so it comes down to whether the extras justify the spend.
Feature gaps: Make offers Branching Logic, Data Mapping and Error Handling that Activepieces lacks. Activepieces brings 100+ Integrations, Code Steps and Self-Hosted that Make does not have. Both share Visual Builder.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Activepieces is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Make is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.
Where each tool shines: Make's biggest strengths are: visual workflow builder is more powerful than zapier. significantly cheaper — more operations per dollar. Activepieces's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.
Watch out for: With Make, users commonly note that steeper learning curve than zapier. With Activepieces, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
choose Make if
- You need a tool built for power users who want complex automations at a lower cost than zapier
- You specifically need Branching Logic and Data Mapping
- You care about significantly cheaper — more operations per dollar
- The free tier works for you: free for 1,000 ops/month
choose Activepieces if
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source workflow automation
- Budget is a hard constraint — Activepieces is free, Make is not
- You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
- You specifically need 100+ Integrations and Code Steps
- You care about includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
frequently asked
What is the difference between Make and Activepieces?
Make is visual automation platform for building complex workflows with a drag-and-drop builder, while Activepieces is open-source automation platform with a visual builder, 100+ integrations, and self-hosting option. The biggest difference up front: Activepieces is free, while Make starts at $9/mo. Make is built for power users who want complex automations at a lower cost than zapier, whereas Activepieces targets teams wanting open-source workflow automation.
Should I use Make or Activepieces?
Activepieces is the free option; Make charges $9/mo but may offer more polish. Here is how they compare.
When should I choose Make over Activepieces?
Choose Make if You need a tool built for power users who want complex automations at a lower cost than zapier; You specifically need Branching Logic and Data Mapping; You care about significantly cheaper — more operations per dollar; The free tier works for you: free for 1,000 ops/month.
When should I choose Activepieces over Make?
Choose Activepieces if Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source workflow automation; Budget is a hard constraint — Activepieces is free, Make is not; You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code; You specifically need 100+ Integrations and Code Steps; You care about includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.
related comparisons
Zapier vs Make · Make vs n8n · Make vs Pipedream · Make vs IFTTT · Make vs Tray.io · Make vs Raycast · Make vs Alfred · Make vs Bardeen