n8n vs Activepieces
n8n is open-source workflow automation with a visual editor. Self-hostable with code flexibility, while Activepieces is open-source automation platform with a visual builder, 100+ integrations, and self-hosting option. n8n is built for technical users who want self-hosted automation with code escape hatches, whereas Activepieces targets teams wanting open-source workflow automation.
| Feature | n8n | Activepieces |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| 100+ Integrations | — | ✓ |
| Code Steps | — | ✓ |
| Custom Code | ✓ | — |
| Open Source | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | ✓ |
| Visual Builder | — | ✓ |
| Visual Editor | ✓ | — |
| Webhooks | ✓ | — |
Pricing: Both n8n and Activepieces are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.
Feature gaps: n8n offers Custom Code, Open Source and Visual Editor that Activepieces lacks. Activepieces brings 100+ Integrations, Code Steps and Visual Builder that n8n does not have. Both share Self-Hosted.
Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.
Open source: Both n8n and Activepieces are open source, so self-hosting and code audits are on the table with either choice.
Where each tool shines: n8n's biggest strengths are: open source and self-hostable. can write custom code within workflows. Activepieces's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.
Watch out for: With n8n, users commonly note that requires technical setup if self-hosting. With Activepieces, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
choose n8n if
- You need a tool built for technical users who want self-hosted automation with code escape hatches
- You specifically need Custom Code and Open Source
- You care about can write custom code within workflows
choose Activepieces if
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source workflow automation
- You specifically need 100+ Integrations and Code Steps
- You care about includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows
frequently asked
What is the difference between n8n and Activepieces?
n8n is open-source workflow automation with a visual editor. Self-hostable with code flexibility, while Activepieces is open-source automation platform with a visual builder, 100+ integrations, and self-hosting option. n8n is built for technical users who want self-hosted automation with code escape hatches, whereas Activepieces targets teams wanting open-source workflow automation.
Should I use n8n or Activepieces?
n8n is built for technical users who want self-hosted automation with code escape hatches. Activepieces is built for teams wanting open-source workflow automation. Pick the one that fits.
When should I choose n8n over Activepieces?
Choose n8n if You need a tool built for technical users who want self-hosted automation with code escape hatches; You specifically need Custom Code and Open Source; You care about can write custom code within workflows.
When should I choose Activepieces over n8n?
Choose Activepieces if Your profile matches its sweet spot: teams wanting open-source workflow automation; You specifically need 100+ Integrations and Code Steps; You care about includes visual builder as a core feature, purpose-built for automation workflows.
related comparisons
Zapier vs n8n · Make vs n8n · n8n vs Pipedream · n8n vs IFTTT · n8n vs Tray.io · n8n vs Raycast · n8n vs Alfred · n8n vs Bardeen