notanothertool

Xata vs Hasura

Xata is serverless database platform with full-text search, analytics, and file attachments on Postgres, while Hasura is Instant GraphQL and REST APIs on Postgres, SQL Server, and other data sources. Hasura is open source and can be self-hosted, giving you full control over your data. Xata is built for developers wanting a serverless database with search built-in, whereas Hasura targets developers wanting instant graphql apis on their database.

FeatureXataHasura
Free tier available
Open source
Analytics
Auth
Branching
File Attachments
Full-Text Search
GraphQL
Real-Time
Remote Schemas

Pricing: Both tools offer free tiers, so you can test each before committing. Xata's free plan: Free 15 GB. Hasura's free plan: Free for 1 project.

Feature gaps: Xata offers Analytics, Branching and File Attachments that Hasura lacks. Hasura brings Auth, GraphQL and Real-Time that Xata does not have.

Team fit: Both tools target small teams teams, so the decision hinges on features and workflow fit rather than scale.

Open source: Hasura is open source, meaning you can self-host, audit the code, and avoid vendor lock-in. Xata is proprietary — you are trusting the vendor with your data and uptime.

Where each tool shines: Xata's biggest strengths are: includes full-text search as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows. built-in analytics show open rates, click rates, and conversion data in real time. Hasura's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes graphql as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows.

Watch out for: With Xata, users commonly note that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade. With Hasura, the main complaint is that free plan exists but key features are locked behind the paid upgrade.

choose Xata if

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting a serverless database with search built-in
  • You specifically need Analytics and Branching
  • You care about built-in analytics show open rates, click rates, and conversion data in real time
  • The free tier works for you: free 15 gb

choose Hasura if

  • Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting instant graphql apis on their database
  • You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code
  • You specifically need Auth and GraphQL
  • You care about includes graphql as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows
  • The free tier works for you: free for 1 project

frequently asked

What is the difference between Xata and Hasura?

Xata is serverless database platform with full-text search, analytics, and file attachments on Postgres, while Hasura is Instant GraphQL and REST APIs on Postgres, SQL Server, and other data sources. Hasura is open source and can be self-hosted, giving you full control over your data. Xata is built for developers wanting a serverless database with search built-in, whereas Hasura targets developers wanting instant graphql apis on their database.

Should I use Xata or Hasura?

Hasura gives you open source and self-hosting; Xata is a managed service. Which trade-off works for you?

When should I choose Xata over Hasura?

Choose Xata if Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting a serverless database with search built-in; You specifically need Analytics and Branching; You care about built-in analytics show open rates, click rates, and conversion data in real time; The free tier works for you: free 15 gb.

When should I choose Hasura over Xata?

Choose Hasura if Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers wanting instant graphql apis on their database; You need self-hosting, data sovereignty, or the ability to audit source code; You specifically need Auth and GraphQL; You care about includes graphql as a core feature, purpose-built for database workflows; The free tier works for you: free for 1 project.

related comparisons

Supabase vs Xata · PlanetScale vs Xata · Neon vs Xata · Firebase vs Xata · Airtable vs Xata · Xata vs Turso · Xata vs MongoDB Atlas · Xata vs CockroachDB