Umami vs PostHog
Umami is open-source, privacy-focused web analytics you can self-host, while PostHog is open-source product analytics suite with session replay, feature flags, A/B testing, and surveys. Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics, whereas PostHog targets product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool.
| Feature | Umami | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| A/B Testing | — | ✓ |
| Cookieless | ✓ | — |
| Custom Events | ✓ | — |
| Feature Flags | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | — |
| Product Analytics | — | ✓ |
| Real-Time Dashboard | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | — |
| Session Replay | — | ✓ |
| Surveys | — | ✓ |
Pricing: Both Umami and PostHog are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.
Feature gaps: Umami offers Cookieless, Custom Events and Open Source that PostHog lacks. PostHog brings A/B Testing, Feature Flags and Product Analytics that Umami does not have.
Team fit: Umami is geared toward individual users and small setups, while PostHog is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Both Umami and PostHog are open source, so self-hosting and code audits are on the table with either choice.
Where each tool shines: Umami's biggest strengths are: free and open source. easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway). PostHog's biggest strengths are: all-in-one: analytics, session replay, feature flags, a/b tests. generous free tier (1m events/mo).
Watch out for: With Umami, users commonly note that requires self-hosting for free use. With PostHog, the main complaint is that can be overwhelming — lots of features.
choose Umami if
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics
- You specifically need Cookieless and Custom Events
- You care about easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway)
- Your team size fits the individuals profile Umami is designed for
choose PostHog if
- You need a tool built for product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool
- You specifically need A/B Testing and Feature Flags
- You care about generous free tier (1m events/mo)
- Your team size fits the any size profile PostHog is designed for
frequently asked
What is the difference between Umami and PostHog?
Umami is open-source, privacy-focused web analytics you can self-host, while PostHog is open-source product analytics suite with session replay, feature flags, A/B testing, and surveys. Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics, whereas PostHog targets product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool.
Should I use Umami or PostHog?
Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics. PostHog is built for product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool. Pick the one that fits.
When should I choose Umami over PostHog?
Choose Umami if Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics; You specifically need Cookieless and Custom Events; You care about easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway); Your team size fits the individuals profile Umami is designed for.
When should I choose PostHog over Umami?
Choose PostHog if You need a tool built for product teams that need analytics, session replay, and feature flags in one tool; You specifically need A/B Testing and Feature Flags; You care about generous free tier (1m events/mo); Your team size fits the any size profile PostHog is designed for.
related comparisons
Google Analytics vs Umami · Plausible vs Umami · Fathom vs Umami · Umami vs Mixpanel · Umami vs Amplitude · Umami vs Hotjar · Umami vs Heap · Umami vs Pirsch