Umami vs Countly
Umami is open-source, privacy-focused web analytics you can self-host, while Countly is open-source product analytics for mobile, web, and desktop with crash reporting. Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics, whereas Countly targets mobile app teams wanting open-source analytics.
| Feature | Umami | Countly |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cookieless | ✓ | — |
| Crash Reports | — | ✓ |
| Custom Events | ✓ | — |
| Mobile Analytics | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | — |
| Push Notifications | — | ✓ |
| Real-Time Dashboard | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | — |
| Surveys | — | ✓ |
Pricing: Both Umami and Countly are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.
Feature gaps: Umami offers Cookieless, Custom Events and Open Source that Countly lacks. Countly brings Crash Reports, Mobile Analytics and Push Notifications that Umami does not have.
Team fit: Umami is geared toward individual users and small setups, while Countly is aimed at mid-size teams teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Both Umami and Countly are open source, so self-hosting and code audits are on the table with either choice.
Where each tool shines: Umami's biggest strengths are: free and open source. easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway). Countly's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. includes mobile analytics as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows.
Watch out for: With Umami, users commonly note that requires self-hosting for free use. With Countly, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
choose Umami if
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics
- You specifically need Cookieless and Custom Events
- You care about easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway)
- Your team size fits the individuals profile Umami is designed for
choose Countly if
- You need a tool built for mobile app teams wanting open-source analytics
- You specifically need Crash Reports and Mobile Analytics
- You care about includes mobile analytics as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows
- Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile Countly is designed for
frequently asked
What is the difference between Umami and Countly?
Umami is open-source, privacy-focused web analytics you can self-host, while Countly is open-source product analytics for mobile, web, and desktop with crash reporting. Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics, whereas Countly targets mobile app teams wanting open-source analytics.
Should I use Umami or Countly?
Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics. Countly is built for mobile app teams wanting open-source analytics. Pick the one that fits.
When should I choose Umami over Countly?
Choose Umami if Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics; You specifically need Cookieless and Custom Events; You care about easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway); Your team size fits the individuals profile Umami is designed for.
When should I choose Countly over Umami?
Choose Countly if You need a tool built for mobile app teams wanting open-source analytics; You specifically need Crash Reports and Mobile Analytics; You care about includes mobile analytics as a core feature, purpose-built for analytics workflows; Your team size fits the mid-size teams profile Countly is designed for.
related comparisons
Google Analytics vs Umami · Plausible vs Umami · Fathom vs Umami · Umami vs PostHog · Umami vs Mixpanel · Umami vs Amplitude · Umami vs Hotjar · Umami vs Heap