Umami vs Matomo
Umami is open-source, privacy-focused web analytics you can self-host, while Matomo is open-source web analytics platform that gives you full control over your data. Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics, whereas Matomo targets organizations wanting full google analytics replacement with privacy.
| Feature | Umami | Matomo |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Open source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cookieless | ✓ | — |
| Custom Events | ✓ | — |
| GDPR | — | ✓ |
| Heatmaps | — | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Real-Time Dashboard | ✓ | — |
| Self-Hosted | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing: Both Umami and Matomo are free, so this decision comes down to features and philosophy rather than budget.
Feature gaps: Umami offers Cookieless, Custom Events and Real-Time Dashboard that Matomo lacks. Matomo brings GDPR and Heatmaps that Umami does not have. Both share Open Source and Self-Hosted.
Team fit: Umami is geared toward individual users and small setups, while Matomo is aimed at any size teams. Pick the one that matches where your team is today and where it is headed — migrating tools later is always painful.
Open source: Both Umami and Matomo are open source, so self-hosting and code audits are on the table with either choice.
Where each tool shines: Umami's biggest strengths are: free and open source. easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway). Matomo's biggest strengths are: open source and transparent. open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development.
Watch out for: With Umami, users commonly note that requires self-hosting for free use. With Matomo, the main complaint is that may lack some advanced features.
choose Umami if
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics
- You specifically need Cookieless and Custom Events
- You care about easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway)
- Your team size fits the individuals profile Umami is designed for
choose Matomo if
- Your profile matches its sweet spot: organizations wanting full google analytics replacement with privacy
- You specifically need GDPR and Heatmaps
- You care about open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development
- Your team size fits the any size profile Matomo is designed for
frequently asked
What is the difference between Umami and Matomo?
Umami is open-source, privacy-focused web analytics you can self-host, while Matomo is open-source web analytics platform that gives you full control over your data. Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics, whereas Matomo targets organizations wanting full google analytics replacement with privacy.
Should I use Umami or Matomo?
Umami is built for developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics. Matomo is built for organizations wanting full google analytics replacement with privacy. Pick the one that fits.
When should I choose Umami over Matomo?
Choose Umami if Your profile matches its sweet spot: developers who want free, self-hosted, privacy-first analytics; You specifically need Cookieless and Custom Events; You care about easy to self-host (docker, vercel, railway); Your team size fits the individuals profile Umami is designed for.
When should I choose Matomo over Umami?
Choose Matomo if Your profile matches its sweet spot: organizations wanting full google analytics replacement with privacy; You specifically need GDPR and Heatmaps; You care about open-source codebase gives you full transparency and community-driven development; Your team size fits the any size profile Matomo is designed for.
related comparisons
Google Analytics vs Umami · Plausible vs Umami · Fathom vs Umami · Umami vs PostHog · Umami vs Mixpanel · Umami vs Amplitude · Umami vs Hotjar · Umami vs Heap